Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M2-her, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M2-her

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 2:54:47 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M2-her
Field
ModelCap position#90#89
Index score28.528.9
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.08$0.30
Output / 1M$0.45$1.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K66K
Providers41
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #90; MiniMax M2-her is #89 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 28.5 for Gemma 3 27B and 28.9 for MiniMax M2-her.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 3 27B is Measured; MiniMax M2-her is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B and $1.20 for MiniMax M2-her.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 65,536 for MiniMax M2-her.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; MiniMax M2-her is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 1 for MiniMax M2-her.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.