Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Ling 3.0 tiny, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Ling 3.0 tiny

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 4:14:24 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Ling 3.0 tiny
Field
Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#82#79
Index score29.832.4
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.08Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.45Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K—
Providers50
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #82; Ling 3.0 tiny is #79 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.8 for Gemma 3 27B and 32.4 for Ling 3.0 tiny.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Ling 3.0 tiny is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 0 for Ling 3.0 tiny.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.