Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Ling-3.0-flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Ling-3.0-flash
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#82#41
Index score29.853.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.08$0.021
Output / 1M$0.45$0.063
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers52
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #82; Ling-3.0-flash is #41 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.8 for Gemma 3 27B and 53.0 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B and $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 262,144 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Ling-3.0-flash is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 2 for Ling-3.0-flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.