Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Mercury 2, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Mercury 2

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Mercury 2
Field
Mercury 2

Inception Labs

ModelCap position#81#80
Index score29.931.2
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.08$0.25
Output / 1M$0.45$0.75
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K128K
Providers51
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #81; Mercury 2 is #80 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.9 for Gemma 3 27B and 31.2 for Mercury 2.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B and $0.75 for Mercury 2.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 128,000 for Mercury 2.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Mercury 2 is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 1 for Mercury 2.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.