Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Field
ModelCap position#177#102
Index score20.323.7
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.05$0.20
Output / 1M$0.15$2.40
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K262K
Providers12
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 12B is #177; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is #102 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 20.3 for Gemma 3 12B and 23.7 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 3 12B is Measured; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.15 for Gemma 3 12B and $2.40 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 12B and 262,144 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 12B is gated; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3 12B and 2 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.