Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3 30B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#175#111
Index score19.524.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.05$0.12
Output / 1M$0.15$0.50
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K131K
Providers12
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 12B is #175; Qwen3 30B A3B is #111 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 19.5 for Gemma 3 12B and 24.0 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.15 for Gemma 3 12B and $0.50 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 12B and 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 12B is gated; Qwen3 30B A3B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3 12B and 2 for Qwen3 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.