Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#180#182
Index score20.318.2
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.05$0.36
Output / 1M$0.15$0.40
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K33K
Providers12
Weight accessGated accessRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 12B is #180; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is #182 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 20.3 for Gemma 3 12B and 18.2 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.15 for Gemma 3 12B and $0.40 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 12B and 32,768 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 12B is gated; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3 12B and 2 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.