Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 12B and Llama 4 Scout, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 4 Scout

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:28:37 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 12B and Llama 4 Scout
Field
ModelCap position#175#172
Index score19.521.3
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1M$0.05$0.10
Output / 1M$0.15$0.30
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K1.3M
Providers13
Weight accessGated accessGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 12B is #175; Llama 4 Scout is #172 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 19.5 for Gemma 3 12B and 21.3 for Llama 4 Scout.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.15 for Gemma 3 12B and $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 12B and 1,310,720 for Llama 4 Scout.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3 12B and 3 for Llama 4 Scout.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.