Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 4 31B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 4 31B
Field
ModelCap position#14#30
Index score73.160.0
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1M$0.375$0.10
Output / 1M$1.88$0.34
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M262K
Providers216
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is #14; Gemma 4 31B is #30 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 73.1 for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 60.0 for Gemma 4 31B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.88 for Gemini 3.7 Flash and $0.34 for Gemma 4 31B.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 262,144 for Gemma 4 31B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemini 3.7 Flash is none; Gemma 4 31B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 16 for Gemma 4 31B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.