Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B
Field
ModelCap position#14#37
Index score73.156.5
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.375$0.07
Output / 1M$1.88$0.34
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M262K
Providers28
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is #14; Gemma 4 26B A4B is #37 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 73.1 for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 56.5 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.88 for Gemini 3.7 Flash and $0.34 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 262,144 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemini 3.7 Flash is none; Gemma 4 26B A4B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 8 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.