Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n 4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemma 3n 4B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash and Gemma 3n 4B
Field
ModelCap position#14#179
Index score73.120.4
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.375$0.06
Output / 1M$1.88$0.12
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M33K
Providers21
Weight accessAPI onlyGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is #14; Gemma 3n 4B is #179 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 73.1 for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 20.4 for Gemma 3n 4B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.88 for Gemini 3.7 Flash and $0.12 for Gemma 3n 4B.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 32,768 for Gemma 3n 4B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemini 3.7 Flash is none; Gemma 3n 4B is gated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 1 for Gemma 3n 4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.