Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with cogito v2 preview llama 70B and Falcon H1 3B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

cogito v2 preview llama 70B vs Falcon H1 3B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of cogito v2 preview llama 70B and Falcon H1 3B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#203#201
Index score21.521.9
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B · finetune (100%)Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (18%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 11 rows (82%); exceeds every named peer on 9 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 10.03 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 7.9 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessRestricted licenseRestricted license

Decision facts

  • cogito v2 preview llama 70B is #203; Falcon H1 3B Instruct is #201 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 21.5 for cogito v2 preview llama 70B and 21.9 for Falcon H1 3B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: cogito v2 preview llama 70B is Inherited; Falcon H1 3B Instruct is Estimated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.