Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with North Mini Code and Mistral Small 3.2 24B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
North Mini Code vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Live dataset updated 9/12/2026, 1:09:54 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | North Mini Code Cohere | Mistral Small 3.2 24B Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #129 | #127 |
| Index score | 34.7 | 36.1 |
| Evidence | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (61%); publisher-corpus-prior over 188 held-out anchors (39%); shrunk 12.4 toward the measured corpus | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | Free | $0.075 |
| Output / 1M | Free | $0.20 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 256K | 256K |
| Providers | 1 | 3 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- North Mini Code is #129; Mistral Small 3.2 24B is #127 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 34.7 for North Mini Code and 36.1 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: North Mini Code is Estimated; Mistral Small 3.2 24B is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0 for North Mini Code and $0.20 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0 for North Mini Code versus $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. North Mini Code costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 256,000 tokens for North Mini Code and 256,000 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for North Mini Code and 3 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.