Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Command R+ (08-2024) and Gemma 3 4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Command R+ (08-2024) vs Gemma 3 4B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Command R+ (08-2024) and Gemma 3 4B
Field
ModelCap position#194#195
Index score11.210.9
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$2.50$0.05
Output / 1M$10.00$0.10
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context128K131K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyGated access

Decision facts

  • Command R+ (08-2024) is #194; Gemma 3 4B is #195 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 11.2 for Command R+ (08-2024) and 10.9 for Gemma 3 4B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for Command R+ (08-2024) and $0.10 for Gemma 3 4B.
  • Published context is 128,000 tokens for Command R+ (08-2024) and 131,072 for Gemma 3 4B.
  • Weight access differs: Command R+ (08-2024) is none; Gemma 3 4B is gated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.