Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Command A and Qwen3 Coder Next, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Command A vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Command A and Qwen3 Coder Next
Field
Command A

Cohere

ModelCap position#86#85
Index score27.527.6
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$2.50$0.12
Output / 1M$10.00$0.80
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context256K262K
Providers14
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Command A is #86; Qwen3 Coder Next is #85 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 27.5 for Command A and 27.6 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for Command A and $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Published context is 256,000 tokens for Command A and 262,144 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Weight access differs: Command A is gated; Qwen3 Coder Next is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Command A and 4 for Qwen3 Coder Next.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.