Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Command A and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Command A vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Command A and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Field
Command A

Cohere

ModelCap position#97#69
Index score26.740.2
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$2.50$0.25
Output / 1M$10.00$2.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context256K400K
Providers11
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • Command A is #97; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is #69 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 26.7 for Command A and 40.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for Command A and $2.00 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Published context is 256,000 tokens for Command A and 400,000 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Weight access differs: Command A is gated; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is none.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.