Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Command A and Ling 3.0 tiny, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Command A vs Ling 3.0 tiny

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Command A and Ling 3.0 tiny
Field
Command A

Cohere

Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#97#83
Index score26.731.9
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$2.50Unavailable
Output / 1M$10.00Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context256K
Providers10
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Command A is #97; Ling 3.0 tiny is #83 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 26.7 for Command A and 31.9 for Ling 3.0 tiny.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Weight access differs: Command A is gated; Ling 3.0 tiny is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Command A and 0 for Ling 3.0 tiny.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.