Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Command A and Mercury 2.5 Preview, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Command A vs Mercury 2.5 Preview

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 1:46:18 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Command A and Mercury 2.5 Preview
Field
Command A

Cohere

Mercury 2.5 Preview

Inception Labs

ModelCap position#97#94
Index score26.727.8
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedstart rank inherited from the measured predecessor in its own product family, less a fixed succession penalty, until independent measurements replace it
Input / 1M$2.50$0.04
Output / 1M$10.00$0.15
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context256K260K
Providers11
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • Command A is #97; Mercury 2.5 Preview is #94 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 26.7 for Command A and 27.8 for Mercury 2.5 Preview.
  • Evidence differs: Command A is Measured; Mercury 2.5 Preview is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for Command A and $0.15 for Mercury 2.5 Preview.
  • Published context is 256,000 tokens for Command A and 260,000 for Mercury 2.5 Preview.
  • Weight access differs: Command A is gated; Mercury 2.5 Preview is none.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.