Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Seed 1.6 and UI-TARS 7B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Seed 1.6 vs UI-TARS 7B

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Seed 1.6 and UI-TARS 7B
Field
Seed 1.6

ByteDance Seed

UI-TARS 7B

ByteDance

ModelCap position#127#132
Index score21.421.4
EvidenceEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.25$0.10
Output / 1M$2.00$0.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K128K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Seed 1.6 is #127; UI-TARS 7B is #132 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 21.4 for Seed 1.6 and 21.4 for UI-TARS 7B.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $2.00 for Seed 1.6 and $0.20 for UI-TARS 7B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Seed 1.6 and 128,000 for UI-TARS 7B.
  • Weight access differs: Seed 1.6 is none; UI-TARS 7B is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.