Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ouro 1.4B and aya vision 32b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ouro 1.4B vs aya vision 32b

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 4:08:40 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ouro 1.4B and aya vision 32b
Field
Ouro 1.4B

ByteDance

aya vision 32b

CohereLabs

ModelCap position#133#136
Index score23.023.0
EvidenceEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsGated access

Decision facts

  • Ouro 1.4B is #133; aya vision 32b is #136 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 23.0 for Ouro 1.4B and 23.0 for aya vision 32b.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.
  • Weight access differs: Ouro 1.4B is open; aya vision 32b is gated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.