Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna XS 2.1, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Laguna XS 2.1
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic | Laguna XS 2.1 Poolside |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #56 | #60 |
| Index score | 56.4 | 54.9 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (30%); global-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (70%); shrunk 1.3 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $1.00 | $0.06 |
| Output / 1M | $5.00 | $0.12 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Providers | 4 | 1 |
| Weight access | API only | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Claude Haiku 4.5 is #56; Laguna XS 2.1 is #60 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 56.4 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 54.9 for Laguna XS 2.1. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is Measured; Laguna XS 2.1 is Estimated.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $5.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.12 for Laguna XS 2.1. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.50 for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus $0.18 for Laguna XS 2.1. Laguna XS 2.1 costs 96.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 200,000 tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 262,144 for Laguna XS 2.1.
- Weight access differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is none; Laguna XS 2.1 is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 1 for Laguna XS 2.1.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.