Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Claude Haiku 4.5 and Fara1.5 27B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Fara1.5 27B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Fara1.5 27B
Field
Fara1.5 27B

Microsoft

ModelCap position#45#48
Index score52.351.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsInheritedfinetune · finetune
Input / 1M$1.00Unavailable
Output / 1M$5.00Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context200K
Providers40
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is #45; Fara1.5 27B is #48 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 52.3 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 51.0 for Fara1.5 27B.
  • Evidence differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is Measured; Fara1.5 27B is Inherited.
  • Weight access differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is none; Fara1.5 27B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 0 for Fara1.5 27B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.