Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ling-3.0-flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ling-3.0-flash
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#45#42
Index score52.353.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$1.00$0.021
Output / 1M$5.00$0.063
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context200K262K
Providers42
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 is #45; Ling-3.0-flash is #42 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 52.3 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 53.0 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $5.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Published context is 200,000 tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 262,144 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Weight access differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is none; Ling-3.0-flash is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 2 for Ling-3.0-flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.