Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Claude Fable 5.1 and Hy4 preview, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hy4 preview

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 5:19:04 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Hy4 preview
Field
ModelCap position#2#19
Index score84.168.6
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedplaced against measured peers on publisher-reported benchmarks, discounted for self-report optimism; floored directly above its measured family predecessor
Input / 1M$10.00$0.834
Output / 1M$50.00$2.50
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M1M
Providers41
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Claude Fable 5.1 is #2; Hy4 preview is #19 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 84.1 for Claude Fable 5.1 and 68.6 for Hy4 preview.
  • Evidence differs: Claude Fable 5.1 is Measured; Hy4 preview is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $50.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 and $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.1 and 1,048,576 for Hy4 preview.
  • Weight access differs: Claude Fable 5.1 is none; Hy4 preview is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Fable 5.1 and 1 for Hy4 preview.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.