Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Nova Pro 1.0 and Phi 3.5 mini instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Nova Pro 1.0 vs Phi 3.5 mini instruct
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Nova Pro 1.0 Amazon | Phi 3.5 mini instruct Microsoft |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #187 | #186 |
| Index score | 23.0 | 24.1 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (26%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (74%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 6 rows; optimism haircut 0.67 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 11.5 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.80 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $3.20 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 300K | — |
| Providers | 1 | 0 |
| Weight access | API only | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Nova Pro 1.0 is #187; Phi 3.5 mini instruct is #186 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 23.0 for Nova Pro 1.0 and 24.1 for Phi 3.5 mini instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Nova Pro 1.0 is Measured; Phi 3.5 mini instruct is Estimated.
- Weight access differs: Nova Pro 1.0 is none; Phi 3.5 mini instruct is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Nova Pro 1.0 and 0 for Phi 3.5 mini instruct.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Sol#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.