Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemma 3 4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Gemma 3 4B

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Nova Pro 1.0 and Gemma 3 4B
Field
ModelCap position#191#197
Index score14.910.9
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.80$0.05
Output / 1M$3.20$0.10
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context300K131K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyGated access

Decision facts

  • Nova Pro 1.0 is #191; Gemma 3 4B is #197 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 14.9 for Nova Pro 1.0 and 10.9 for Gemma 3 4B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.20 for Nova Pro 1.0 and $0.10 for Gemma 3 4B.
  • Published context is 300,000 tokens for Nova Pro 1.0 and 131,072 for Gemma 3 4B.
  • Weight access differs: Nova Pro 1.0 is none; Gemma 3 4B is gated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.