Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Nova Micro 1.0 and Phi 3.5 MoE instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Nova Micro 1.0 vs Phi 3.5 MoE instruct

Live dataset updated 9/23/2026, 4:02:17 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Nova Micro 1.0 and Phi 3.5 MoE instruct
Field
ModelCap position#214#218
Index score14.312.8
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 215 held-out anchors (42%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (58%); exceeds every named peer on 4 of 6 rows; optimism haircut 0.67 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 4.2 toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.035Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.14Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context128K—
Providers10
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Nova Micro 1.0 is #214; Phi 3.5 MoE instruct is #218 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 14.3 for Nova Micro 1.0 and 12.8 for Phi 3.5 MoE instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Nova Micro 1.0 is Measured; Phi 3.5 MoE instruct is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: Nova Micro 1.0 is none; Phi 3.5 MoE instruct is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Nova Micro 1.0 and 0 for Phi 3.5 MoE instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.