Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with WizardLM 2 8x22B and Instella MoE 16B A3B Think, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

WizardLM 2 8x22B vs Instella MoE 16B A3B Think

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of WizardLM 2 8x22B and Instella MoE 16B A3B Think
Field
ModelCap position#115#116
Index score22.522.5
EvidenceEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context66K—
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • WizardLM 2 8x22B is #115; Instella MoE 16B A3B Think is #116 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.5 for WizardLM 2 8x22B and 22.5 for Instella MoE 16B A3B Think.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.
  • Weight access differs: WizardLM 2 8x22B is open; Instella MoE 16B A3B Think is restricted.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.