Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Olmo 3 32B Think and Gemma 3n 4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Olmo 3 32B Think vs Gemma 3n 4B

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Olmo 3 32B Think and Gemma 3n 4B
Field
Olmo 3 32B Think

Allen Institute

ModelCap position#187#176
Index score15.520.4
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.06
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.12
Pricing statusemptyfresh
Context66K33K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsGated access

Decision facts

  • Olmo 3 32B Think is #187; Gemma 3n 4B is #176 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 15.5 for Olmo 3 32B Think and 20.4 for Gemma 3n 4B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 65,536 tokens for Olmo 3 32B Think and 32,768 for Gemma 3n 4B.
  • Weight access differs: Olmo 3 32B Think is open; Gemma 3n 4B is gated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Olmo 3 32B Think and 1 for Gemma 3n 4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.