Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Olmo 3 1125 32B and Phi 4, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

Olmo 3 1125 32B vs Phi 4

Live dataset updated 9/23/2026, 4:02:17 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of Olmo 3 1125 32B and Phi 4
Field	Olmo 3 1125 32B Allen Institute	Phi 4 Microsoft
ModelCap position	#207	#209
Index score	19.5	16.3
Evidence	Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 215 held-out anchors (27%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (73%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 6 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.2 toward the measured corpus	Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M	Unavailable	$0.07
Output / 1M	Unavailable	$0.14
Pricing status	unavailable	fresh
Context	—	16K
Providers	0	1
Weight access	Open weights	Open weights

Decision facts

Olmo 3 1125 32B is #207; Phi 4 is #209 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 19.5 for Olmo 3 1125 32B and 16.3 for Phi 4. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Evidence differs: Olmo 3 1125 32B is Estimated; Phi 4 is Measured.
ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Olmo 3 1125 32B and 1 for Phi 4.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.