Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Olmo 3 1125 32B and gemma 2 9b it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Olmo 3 1125 32B vs gemma 2 9b it

Live dataset updated 9/23/2026, 4:02:17 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Olmo 3 1125 32B and gemma 2 9b it
Field
Olmo 3 1125 32B

Allen Institute

ModelCap position#207#208
Index score19.517.7
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 215 held-out anchors (27%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 6 rows (73%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 6 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.2 toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsGated access

Decision facts

  • Olmo 3 1125 32B is #207; gemma 2 9b it is #208 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 19.5 for Olmo 3 1125 32B and 17.7 for gemma 2 9b it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Olmo 3 1125 32B is Estimated; gemma 2 9b it is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: Olmo 3 1125 32B is open; gemma 2 9b it is gated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.