Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Olmo 3 1125 32B and Command R+ (08-2024), or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Olmo 3 1125 32B vs Command R+ (08-2024)
Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Olmo 3 1125 32B Allen Institute | Command R+ (08-2024) Cohere |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #170 | #173 |
| Index score | 18.5 | 15.5 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 6 rows (91%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 6 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.2 up toward the measured corpus | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | Unavailable | $2.50 |
| Output / 1M | Unavailable | $10.00 |
| Pricing status | unavailable | fresh |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Providers | 0 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- Olmo 3 1125 32B is #170; Command R+ (08-2024) is #173 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 18.5 for Olmo 3 1125 32B and 15.5 for Command R+ (08-2024). Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Olmo 3 1125 32B is Estimated; Command R+ (08-2024) is Measured.
- Weight access differs: Olmo 3 1125 32B is open; Command R+ (08-2024) is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Olmo 3 1125 32B and 1 for Command R+ (08-2024).
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.