Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL and Nova Pro 1.0, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL vs Nova Pro 1.0

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL and Nova Pro 1.0
Field
ModelCap position#145#144
Index score18.518.7
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3-4b-it · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.80
Output / 1MUnavailable$3.20
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context300K
Providers01
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only

Decision facts

  • Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL is #145; Nova Pro 1.0 is #144 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 18.5 for Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL and 18.7 for Nova Pro 1.0. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL is Inherited; Nova Pro 1.0 is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL is restricted; Nova Pro 1.0 is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Gemma SEA LION v4 4B VL and 1 for Nova Pro 1.0.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.