Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and Falcon H1R 7B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 vs Falcon H1R 7B

Live dataset updated 9/12/2026, 1:09:54 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and Falcon H1R 7B
Field
ModelCap position#152#151
Index score29.330.0
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3-12b-it · finetune (100%)Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 188 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 7 rows (91%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; optimism haircut 2.2 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.2 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessRestricted licenseRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 is #152; Falcon H1R 7B is #151 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.3 for Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 and 30.0 for Falcon H1R 7B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma SEA Guard 12B 2602 is Inherited; Falcon H1R 7B is Estimated.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.