Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 4.6V (Z.ai) and GLM 5V Turbo (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, GLM 5V Turbo holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#45 vs #109); GLM 4.6V is 4.4× cheaper per output token ($0.90/1M vs $4.00/1M); GLM 5V Turbo offers the longer context window (203K vs 131K tokens); and GLM 4.6V ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose GLM 4.6V if…

  • API cost matters — $0.90/1M output tokens against $4.00/1M, about 4.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $1.20/1M.
  • you want to self-host: GLM 4.6V ships open weights while GLM 5V Turbo is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.

Choose GLM 5V Turbo if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #45 against #109 (68.8 vs 48.5 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 203K tokens against 131K.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1489 against 1416.
  • AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 98.5% against 30.7%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 17.1% against 3.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GLM 5V Turbo was listed 1 April 2026, GLM 4.6V 8 December 2025.

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5V Turbo: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GLM 4.6V and GLM 5V Turbo
FieldGLM 4.6VZ.aiGLM 5V TurboZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#109#45
Index score48.568.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.30$1.20
Output price / 1M tokens$0.90$4.00
Context window131K tokens203K tokens
Max output tokens33K131K
API providers listed21
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesImage, Text, VideoImage, Text, Video
First listed8 December 20251 April 2026
PublisherZ.aiZ.ai

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5V Turbo

Public benchmark boards where GLM 4.6V or GLM 5V Turbo has a published result
BoardGLM 4.6VGLM 5V TurboLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14161391–144214891477–1501GLM 5V Turbo
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis30.7%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false98.5%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueGLM 5V Turbo
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis3.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false17.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueGLM 5V Turbo

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5V Turbo: common questions

Is GLM 4.6V better than GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #45 against #109. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is GLM 4.6V cheaper than GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 4.6V is cheaper on output tokens: $0.90/1M against $4.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for GLM 4.6V and $1.20/1M for GLM 5V Turbo. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.05 for GLM 4.6V versus $4.40 for GLM 5V Turbo. GLM 4.6V costs 76.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.6V or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo has the larger context window: 203K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, GLM 4.6V or GLM 5V Turbo?

Arena coding: GLM 4.6V 1416, GLM 5V Turbo 1489 — GLM 5V Turbo leads.

Are GLM 4.6V and GLM 5V Turbo open-weight models?

GLM 4.6V: Open weights. GLM 5V Turbo: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run GLM 4.6V and GLM 5V Turbo?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for GLM 4.6V and 1 for GLM 5V Turbo, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further