Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Grok 4.7 (xAI) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Grok 4.7 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#4 vs #10); MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 17.1× cheaper per output token ($0.28/1M vs $4.80/1M); MiMo-V2.6-Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 500K tokens); and MiMo-V2.6-Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Grok 4.7 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #4 against #10 (88.2 vs 84.4 points).

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.28/1M output tokens against $4.80/1M, about 17.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.14/1M against $1.60/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 500K.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ships open weights while Grok 4.7 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Flash was listed 21 September 2026, Grok 4.7 21 September 2026.

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
FieldGrok 4.7xAIMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#4#10
Index score88.284.4
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$1.60$0.14
Output price / 1M tokens$4.80$0.28
Context window500K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens450K131K
API providers listed12
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed21 September 202621 September 2026
PublisherxAIXiaomi

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · publisher-corpus-prior over 208 held-out anchors (8%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 7 rows (92%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Public benchmark boards where Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a published result
BoardGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis46.4intelligence-index:v4.3:xhighOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis43.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Grok 4.7 (xhigh)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)37.6%34.0%–41.1%Grok Build · X-HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: common questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Grok 4.7 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #4 against #10. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Grok 4.7 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.28/1M against $4.80/1M. Input tokens are $1.60/1M for Grok 4.7 and $0.14/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $5.60 for Grok 4.7 versus $0.42 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 92.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 500K.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash open-weight models?

Grok 4.7: API only. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Grok 4.7 and 2 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further