Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Hy4 preview (Tencent) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#10 vs #28); and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 8.9× cheaper per output token ($0.28/1M vs $2.50/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Hy4 preview if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Hy4 preview leads MiMo-V2.6-Flash for this pair.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #10 against #28 (84.4 vs 76.4 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.28/1M output tokens against $2.50/1M, about 8.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.14/1M against $0.834/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Flash was listed 21 September 2026, Hy4 preview 28 August 2026.

Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
FieldHy4 previewTencentMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#28#10
Index score76.484.4
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.834$0.14
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$0.28
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens64K131K
API providers listed12
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed28 August 202621 September 2026
PublisherTencentXiaomi

Evidence: 9 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (46%); publisher-corpus-prior over 208 held-out anchors (10%); opens above measured predecessor tencent/hy3 on same-family ordering evidence (36%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.5% support (8%); shrunk 1 toward the measured corpus · publisher-corpus-prior over 208 held-out anchors (8%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 7 rows (92%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 7 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Public benchmark boards where Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a published result
BoardHy4 previewMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeads
LMArena AgentLMArena5.0%4.0%–6.0%Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: common questions

Is Hy4 preview better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #10 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Hy4 preview cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.28/1M against $2.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.834/1M for Hy4 preview and $0.14/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.92 for Hy4 preview versus $0.42 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 85.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Flash open-weight models?

Hy4 preview: Open weights. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Hy4 preview and 2 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further