Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 22 September 2026
As of 22 September 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#69 vs #104); and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 1.9× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $1.90/1M).
Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: common questions
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #69 against #104. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $1.90/1M. Input tokens are $0.30/1M for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and $0.21/1M for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.10 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B versus $1.37 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs 19.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
Both publish a 262K-token context window.
Which is better for coding, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
Are Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct open-weight models?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Open weights. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?
ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 5 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.