Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Qwen) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#90 vs #96); and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper per output token ($1.90/1M vs $2.08/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #90 against #96 (58.1 vs 57.6 points).
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 3.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1416 against 1413.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was listed 25 February 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 23 September 2025.

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct if…

  • API cost matters — $1.90/1M output tokens against $2.08/1M.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.21/1M against $0.26/1M.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1463 against 1458.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
FieldQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwenQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
ModelCap Index position#90#96
Index score58.157.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.26$0.21
Output price / 1M tokens$2.08$1.90
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Declared route output cap66K33K
API providers listed43
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
First listed25 February 202623 September 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has a published result
BoardQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14161412–1421Not reported14131407–1420Not reportedQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14581451–146514631450–1476Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: common questions

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #90 against #96. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens: $1.90/1M against $2.08/1M. Input tokens are $0.26/1M for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and $0.21/1M for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.56 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B versus $1.37 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 12.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Both publish a 262K-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Arena coding: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 1458, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 1463 — Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads.

Are Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct open-weight models?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: Open weights. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and 3 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further