Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (Qwen) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 7 November 2026

As of 7 November 2026, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#97 vs #114); Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 1.8× cheaper per output token ($1.90/1M vs $3.50/1M); and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct offers the longer context window (262K vs 128K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for this pair.

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #97 against #114 (57.3 vs 52.8 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.90/1M output tokens against $3.50/1M, about 1.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.21/1M against $0.45/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 128K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1413 against 1400.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1462 against 1442.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was listed 23 September 2025, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 25 July 2025.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
FieldQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507QwenQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
ModelCap Index position#114#97
Index score52.857.3
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.45$0.21
Output price / 1M tokens$3.50$1.90
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
Declared route output cap16K33K
API providers listed13
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
First listed25 July 202523 September 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has a published result
BoardQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14001393–1406Not reported14131407–1420Not reportedQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14421427–145614621450–1475Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: common questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 7 November 2026: #97 against #114. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens: $1.90/1M against $3.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.45/1M for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and $0.21/1M for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.65 for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 versus $1.37 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 48.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 128K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Arena coding: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 1442, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 1462 — Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads.

Are Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct open-weight models?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: Open weights. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and 3 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 7 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further