Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Qwen3.8 Flash (Qwen) and Grok 4.7 (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Grok 4.7 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#4 vs #17); Qwen3.8 Flash is 10.2× cheaper per output token ($0.47/1M vs $4.80/1M); and Qwen3.8 Flash offers the longer context window (1M vs 500K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.47/1M output tokens against $4.80/1M, about 10.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $1.60/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 500K.

Choose Grok 4.7 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #4 against #17 (84.9 vs 78.7 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 46.4 against 39.8.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 43.1% against 38.0%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Grok 4.7 was listed 21 September 2026, Qwen3.8 Flash 26 August 2026.

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.7
FieldQwen3.8 FlashQwenGrok 4.7xAI
ModelCap Index position#17#4
Index score78.784.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.15$1.60
Output price / 1M tokens$0.47$4.80
Context window1M tokens500K tokens
Max output tokens131K450K
API providers listed11
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, File
First listed26 August 202621 September 2026
PublisherQwenxAI

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.8 Flash or Grok 4.7 has a published result
BoardQwen3.8 FlashGrok 4.7Leads
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis39.8intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified46.4intelligence-index:v4.3:xhighGrok 4.7
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis38.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.8-Flash-Next":reasoning=true43.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Grok 4.7 (xhigh)":reasoning=trueGrok 4.7
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)37.6%34.0%–41.1%Grok Build · X-HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7: common questions

Is Qwen3.8 Flash better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #4 against #17. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper than Grok 4.7?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.47/1M against $4.80/1M. Input tokens are $0.15/1M for Qwen3.8 Flash and $1.60/1M for Grok 4.7. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.53 for Qwen3.8 Flash versus $5.60 for Grok 4.7. Qwen3.8 Flash costs 90.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Flash or Grok 4.7?

Qwen3.8 Flash has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 500K.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.8 Flash or Grok 4.7?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.7 open-weight models?

Qwen3.8 Flash: Restricted license. Grok 4.7: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.8 Flash and Grok 4.7?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3.8 Flash and 1 for Grok 4.7, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further