Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen3.7 Plus (Qwen) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Qwen3.7 Plus holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#36 vs #131); Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is 1.3× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $1.28/1M); Qwen3.7 Plus offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.7 Plus if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #36 against #131 (72.3 vs 49.8 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1456 against 1388.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1500 against 1457.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.7 Plus was listed 3 June 2026, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 23 July 2025.

Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…

  • API cost matters — $1.00/1M output tokens against $1.28/1M, about 1.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $0.32/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights while Qwen3.7 Plus is no linked weights.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
FieldQwen3.7 PlusQwenQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
ModelCap Index position#36#131
Index score72.349.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.32$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$1.28$1.00
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Declared route output cap131K66K
API providers listed12
Weight accessNo linked weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed3 June 202623 July 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has a published result
BoardQwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14561451–1460Not reported13881383–1393Not reportedQwen3.7 Plus
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15001494–150614571448–1466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena AgentLMArena-7.5%-9.0%–-5.9%—Only one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)—55.4%Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: common questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3.7 Plus ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #36 against #131. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Qwen3.7 Plus cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $1.28/1M. Input tokens are $0.32/1M for Qwen3.7 Plus and $0.30/1M for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.28 for Qwen3.7 Plus versus $1.10 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs 14.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Arena coding: Qwen3.7 Plus 1500, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 1457 — Qwen3.7 Plus leads.

Are Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B open-weight models?

Qwen3.7 Plus: No linked weights. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3.7 Plus and 2 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further