Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Qwen) and Qwen3.7 Plus (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 6 November 2026
As of 6 November 2026, Qwen3.7 Plus holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#36 vs #90); Qwen3.7 Plus is 1.6× cheaper per output token ($1.28/1M vs $2.08/1M); Qwen3.7 Plus offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ships open weights.
Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus has a published result
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.7 Plus: common questions
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #36 against #90. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on output tokens: $1.28/1M against $2.08/1M. Input tokens are $0.26/1M for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and $0.32/1M for Qwen3.7 Plus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.56 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B versus $1.28 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 17.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Arena coding: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 1458, Qwen3.7 Plus 1500 — Qwen3.7 Plus leads.
Are Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.7 Plus open-weight models?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: Open weights. Qwen3.7 Plus: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.7 Plus?
ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and 1 for Qwen3.7 Plus, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.