Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiMo V2 Flash

Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) and MiMo V2 Flash (XiaomiMiMo) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 10 September 2026

As of 10 September 2026, Qwen3.5 397B A17B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#42 vs #45).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…

you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #42 against #45 (63.3 vs 61.6 points).
you want provider choice — 10 listed API providers against 0.
AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 95.6% against 83.9%.
AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 29.0% against 8.6%.
you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.5 397B A17B was listed 16 February 2026, MiMo V2 Flash 16 December 2025.

Choose MiMo V2 Flash if…

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 61.8% against 51.3%.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiMo V2 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and MiMo V2 Flash
Field	Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen	MiMo V2 FlashXiaomiMiMo
ModelCap Index position	#42	#45
Index score	63.3	61.6
Evidence	Measured	Estimated
Input price / 1M tokens	$0.55	Unlisted
Output price / 1M tokens	$3.50	Unlisted
Context window	262K tokens	— tokens
Max output tokens	236K	—
API providers listed	10	0
Weight access	Open weights	Open weights
Input modalities	Text, Image, Video	Text
First listed	16 February 2026	16 December 2025
Publisher	Qwen	XiaomiMiMo

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · global-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (12%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 10 rows (88%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 10 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.3 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiMo V2 Flash

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.5 397B A17B or MiMo V2 Flash has a published result
Board	Qwen3.5 397B A17B	MiMo V2 Flash	Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)	14911486–1496	—	Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis	19.1intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified	—	Only one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis	51.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B":reasoning=true	61.8%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false	MiMo V2 Flash
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis	95.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B":reasoning=true	83.9%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false	Qwen3.5 397B A17B
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis	29.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B":reasoning=true	8.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=false	Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiMo V2 Flash: common questions

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than MiMo V2 Flash?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 10 September 2026: #42 against #45. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheaper than MiMo V2 Flash?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or MiMo V2 Flash?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or MiMo V2 Flash?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Qwen3.5 397B A17B 51.3%, MiMo V2 Flash 61.8% — MiMo V2 Flash leads.

Are Qwen3.5 397B A17B and MiMo V2 Flash open-weight models?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Open weights. MiMo V2 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.5 397B A17B and MiMo V2 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 10 API providers for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 0 for MiMo V2 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiMo V2 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 10 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.