Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Qwen) and Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 1 October 2026

As of 1 October 2026, Qwen3.6 35B A3B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#72 vs #77); and Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 2.1× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $2.08/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…

  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 47.6% against 44.9%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 25.2% against 22.2%.

Choose Qwen3.6 35B A3B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #72 against #77 (60.7 vs 59.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.00/1M output tokens against $2.08/1M, about 2.1× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.26/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 9 listed API providers against 4.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 18.2 against 15.6.
  • AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 95.3% against 93.6%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.6 35B A3B was listed 27 April 2026, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 25 February 2026.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
FieldQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwenQwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
ModelCap Index position#77#72
Index score59.560.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.26$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$2.08$1.00
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K236K
API providers listed49
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video
First listed25 February 202627 April 2026
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B has a published result
BoardQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen3.6 35B A3BLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14161412–1420Not reported—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14581451–1465—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis15.6Reasoning18.2ReasoningQwen3.6 35B A3B
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis47.6%Reasoning44.9%ReasoningQwen3.5-122B-A10B
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis93.6%Reasoning95.3%ReasoningQwen3.6 35B A3B
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis25.2%Reasoning22.2%ReasoningQwen3.5-122B-A10B

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: common questions

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 1 October 2026: #72 against #77. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $2.08/1M. Input tokens are $0.26/1M for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and $0.15/1M for Qwen3.6 35B A3B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.56 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B versus $0.80 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B. Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 48.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 47.6%, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 44.9% — Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads.

Are Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B open-weight models?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: Open weights. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and 9 for Qwen3.6 35B A3B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 1 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further