Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Qwen) and Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Qwen3.5 397B A17B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#42 vs #73); and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($2.08/1M vs $3.50/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…

  • API cost matters — $2.08/1M output tokens against $3.50/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.26/1M against $0.55/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.5-122B-A10B was listed 25 February 2026, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 16 February 2026.

Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #42 against #73 (69.7 vs 60.8 points).
  • you want provider choice — 10 listed API providers against 5.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1491 against 1459.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 18.4 against 15.6.
  • AA τ²-Bench Telecom is your yardstick — 95.6% against 93.6%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 29.0% against 25.2%.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
FieldQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwenQwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
ModelCap Index position#73#42
Index score60.869.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.26$0.55
Output price / 1M tokens$2.08$3.50
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens66K236K
API providers listed510
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video
First listed25 February 202616 February 2026
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a published result
BoardQwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen3.5 397B A17BLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14591452–146614911486–1496Qwen3.5 397B A17B
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis15.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified18.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedQwen3.5 397B A17B
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis93.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)":reasoning=true95.6%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueQwen3.5 397B A17B
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis25.2%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)":reasoning=true29.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)":reasoning=trueQwen3.5 397B A17B

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: common questions

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #42 against #73. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper on output tokens: $2.08/1M against $3.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.26/1M for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and $0.55/1M for Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.56 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B versus $2.85 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs 45.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Both publish a 262K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Arena coding: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 1459, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 1491 — Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads.

Are Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B open-weight models?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: Open weights. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and 10 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further