Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Qwen) and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#131 vs #249); Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 2.5× cheaper per output token ($0.40/1M vs $1.00/1M); Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B offers the longer context window (262K vs 33K tokens); and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…

  • API cost matters — $0.40/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M, about 2.5× cheaper.

Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #131 against #249 (49.8 vs 27.6 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.30/1M against $0.36/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 33K.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ships open weights while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1388 against 1303.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1457 against 1355.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B was listed 23 July 2025, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 19 September 2024.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
FieldQwen2.5 72B InstructQwenQwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
ModelCap Index position#249#131
Index score27.649.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.36$0.30
Output price / 1M tokens$0.40$1.00
Context window33K tokens262K tokens
Declared route output cap16K66K
API providers listed12
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed19 September 202423 July 2025
PublisherQwenQwen

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Public benchmark boards where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has a published result
BoardQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)13031299–1307Not reported13881383–1393Not reportedQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13551347–136214571448–1466Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)—55.4%Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: common questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #131 against #249. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens: $0.40/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.36/1M for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and $0.30/1M for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.92 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct versus $1.10 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 16.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 33K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Arena coding: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 1355, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 1457 — Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B leads.

Are Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B open-weight models?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: Restricted license. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and 2 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further