Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 3 October 2026

As of 3 October 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#4 vs #14); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 4× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $10.00/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #4 against #14 (83.0 vs 78.9 points).
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1483 against 1471.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1542 against 1509.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6.1 Sol was listed 29 September 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $10.00/1M, about 4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1M.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
FieldGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
ModelCap Index position#4#14
Index score83.078.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$10.00$2.50
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
Declared route output cap128K1.8M
API providers listed31
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText, Image, File
First listed29 September 202631 March 2026
PublisherOpenAIxAI

Evidence: 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Public benchmark boards where GPT-6.1 Sol or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
BoardGPT-6.1 SolGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14831473–1494Max14711467–1474Beta · 0309GPT-6.1 Sol
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15421518–1566Max15091503–1514Beta · 0309GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena AgentLMArena11.2%8.5%–14.0%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation94.2%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation52.7%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis51.8Max—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis52.9%Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 October 2026: #4 against #14. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for GPT-6.1 Sol and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $9.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 58.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Sol or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-6.1 Sol or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Arena coding: GPT-6.1 Sol 1542, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1509 — GPT-6.1 Sol leads.

Are GPT-6.1 Sol and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?

GPT-6.1 Sol: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-6.1 Sol and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for GPT-6.1 Sol and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-6.1 Sol vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 3 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further