Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.2 Chat vs o3 Pro

GPT-5.2 Chat (OpenAI) and o3 Pro (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 17 August 2026

As of 17 August 2026, GPT-5.2 Chat holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#9 vs #54); GPT-5.2 Chat is 5.7× cheaper per output token ($14.00/1M vs $80.00/1M); and o3 Pro offers the longer context window (200K vs 128K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.2 Chat if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #9 against #54 (74.9 vs 46.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $14.00/1M output tokens against $80.00/1M, about 5.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.75/1M against $20.00/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-5.2 Chat was listed 10 December 2025, o3 Pro 10 June 2025.

Choose o3 Pro if…

  • you need the longer context window — 200K tokens against 128K.

GPT-5.2 Chat vs o3 Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.2 Chat and o3 Pro
FieldGPT-5.2 ChatOpenAIo3 ProOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#9#54
Index score74.946.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.75$20.00
Output price / 1M tokens$14.00$80.00
Context window128K tokens200K tokens
Max output tokens32K100K
API providers listed11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText, File, Image
First listed10 December 202510 June 2025
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.2 Chat vs o3 Pro

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.2 Chat or o3 Pro has a published result
BoardGPT-5.2 Chato3 ProLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15151508–1522Only one result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis33.3intelligence-indexOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.2 Chat vs o3 Pro: common questions

Is GPT-5.2 Chat better than o3 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Chat ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 17 August 2026: #9 against #54. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it.

Is GPT-5.2 Chat cheaper than o3 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Chat is cheaper on output tokens: $14.00/1M against $80.00/1M. Input tokens are $1.75/1M for GPT-5.2 Chat and $20.00/1M for o3 Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.2 Chat or o3 Pro?

o3 Pro has the larger context window: 200K tokens against 128K.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 Chat or o3 Pro?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are GPT-5.2 Chat and o3 Pro open-weight models?

GPT-5.2 Chat: API only. o3 Pro: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run GPT-5.2 Chat and o3 Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for GPT-5.2 Chat and 1 for o3 Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.2 Chat vs o3 Pro comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 17 August 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further