Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs gpt-oss-20b

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (NVIDIA) and gpt-oss-20b (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, gpt-oss-20b holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#161 vs #168); gpt-oss-20b is 1.5× cheaper per output token ($0.13/1M vs $0.20/1M); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B offers the longer context window (262K vs 131K tokens); and gpt-oss-20b ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…

  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 131K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B was listed 14 December 2025, gpt-oss-20b 5 August 2025.

Choose gpt-oss-20b if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #161 against #168 (28.0 vs 23.7 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.13/1M output tokens against $0.20/1M, about 1.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.03/1M against $0.05/1M.
  • you want to self-host: gpt-oss-20b ships open weights while Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 13 listed API providers against 4.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1369 against 1361.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs gpt-oss-20b: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and gpt-oss-20b
FieldNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIAgpt-oss-20bOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#168#161
Index score23.728.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.05$0.03
Output price / 1M tokens$0.20$0.13
Context window262K tokens131K tokens
Max output tokens236K118K
API providers listed413
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed14 December 20255 August 2025
PublisherNVIDIAOpenAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs gpt-oss-20b

Public benchmark boards where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or gpt-oss-20b has a published result
BoardNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bgpt-oss-20bLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13611350–1371BF1613691356–1382gpt-oss-20b
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis9.0intelligence-index:v4.3:highOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis60.2%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="gpt-oss-20b (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis11.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="gpt-oss-20b (high)":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs gpt-oss-20b: common questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than gpt-oss-20b?

gpt-oss-20b ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #161 against #168. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B cheaper than gpt-oss-20b?

gpt-oss-20b is cheaper on output tokens: $0.13/1M against $0.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.05/1M for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and $0.03/1M for gpt-oss-20b. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.20 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B versus $0.13 for gpt-oss-20b. gpt-oss-20b costs 37.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or gpt-oss-20b?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 131K.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or gpt-oss-20b?

Arena coding: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 1361, gpt-oss-20b 1369 — gpt-oss-20b leads.

Are Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and gpt-oss-20b open-weight models?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Restricted license. gpt-oss-20b: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and gpt-oss-20b?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and 13 for gpt-oss-20b, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs gpt-oss-20b comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further